During the recent and former General Conference Sessions, under all the controversy and turmoil the leadership of the Adventist Church has been receiving because of her now consistently papal endeavors and agenda, the Vatican Flag has been flown along with the other flags representing the nations of the world. When people demonstrate concerns over these consistently papal actions, the actors do what they can to control our thoughts to believe that this is not true. They would say, "There is a conspiracy? LOL (Laugh out Loud!)! HAA HAA HAA!!!!"

But why make such a big deal over such a trivial issue anyway? some would say. This usually is not taking into account the many other actions taking place of a Catholic nature in the Adventist Church mostly sponsored by the leadership. Why should such a thing take place during the present turmoil when independent ministries are revealing that the Adventist Church organization is horribly infiltrated by the armies of the Pope? Doesn't anyone have any common sense around here? We have already shown that the leadership, as well as every other observant person around today understands that Adventist leadership is least trusted today than at any other time in the history of this denomination. We also conclude that it cannot possibly be the "true and PURE gospel" that granted them such a relentlessly sought-after status. We have shown that they, like our similar national leaders, could not afford to sit down and have meetings to find out what is causing such distrust because of the fact that they already know what is causing it. It is always at that time where they have to accomplish more endeavors of a papal nature to continue to fight this war so that the people understand that they have to get used to their new leaders plainly revealed in the prophecies.

So then the issue of the Vatican flag doesn't mean anything?

Well if you are Black, you would know the significance of flying the Confederate Battle Flag in public places. You would be keenly aware of what is involved in the flying of that flag. You would know well that it would not taste good to be flown over the graves of Blacks who were killed during the days of slavery and Jim Crow. It represents separated families. It represents blood, sweat, tears and ruined lives. It represents raped women and human beings treated like property. Sure there are many who do not think so, but we have the cure for them. Enforce the same conditions upon them, and soon everyone will acquire the love of Christ in their hearts, and Satan, with all insensitivity will flee from their hearts mysteriously also. We therefore portray here that the evidence is undebateable, contrary to those who say different.

Another good example is Nazi Germany. There is a symbol to represent Nazi Germany, and that symbol is the Swastika. Jews would have very good reasons to make sure that the Swastika never gets shown on anything. We sympathize with those sentiments, for the symbol literally represents something. Would the Adventist Church think to use that symbol to represent any kind of a nation that exists today and uses the same principles and rules? What about the people who live in that nation; for they told us that it was consideration for people who lived in Vatican City why they braved all the contention again to institute something anyone should with common sense know would cause such turmoil and trouble. Why could not the Italian flag suffice to represent everyone who lived in Italy?

The issue of the Vatican flag is even worse, for it represents murders that were even more brutal, plentiful, historic and vicious beyond imagination. What is more is the fact that these murders, persecutions and tortures were not waged against just ordinary people: they were waged against the very Saints of the Most High themselves. You need to read especially Foxe's Book of Martyrs in order to get a conservative look at how conditions were during the Dark Ages and Protestant Reformation if you want to make a comparison between the Confederate Battle Flag and the Vatican Flag. Prophecy tells us that plagues are headed for Rome in just the near future, one of which is the waters turning to the blood that they love to drink so much. While these plagues are falling, would the Adventist Church think to fly that Vatican Flag in honor of Christians who live at the Vatican? Again, why couldn't the Italian flag suffice so that all this unnecessary agitation could be avoided?

WHAT WILL THEN HAPPEN WHEN THE FULL BODY OF CHRIST GOES TO HEAVEN, AND THOSE SAINTS WHO WERE MURDERED BY THE PAPACY VIEW THE FACT THAT THE ADVENTIST DENOMINATIONAL LEADERS, ALONG WITH EVERYTHING ELSE THEY HAVE DONE OF A VATICAN NATURE, BRAVED ALL THE TROUBLE CONSISTENTLY AGAIN TO MAKE SURE THAT THE VATICAN FLAG WAS FLOWN DURING HER GENERAL CONFERENCE SESSIONS? Would you imagine them embracing the new leaders of the Adventist Church who did this in their honor??

The conclusion therefore is that one way to find out the truth or falsity of positions is through Universal Election: considering what the Saints have all collectively thought on the issues when they were not in apostasy. Would the new decisions now being forced upon the Adventist Church please the majority of God's people who have passed on and are now dead? The issue here even of seniority and majority is far more than the advantage already enjoyed by those who still believe in Adventism, contrary to the minority within who are struggling to overturn it.