IF YOU HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE, YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT PRIVACY??

Page Created 09/23/2001; Updated 10/28/2001: Text and links added and/or rearranged for convenience.

Since the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, our American government is now asking of the citizens of the United States what they have asked before persistently: for them to surrender at least some of their rights and liberties. It is being pressed upon them that it is necessary for them to give up their rights to privacy in order to attain safety and security. If the American citizens therefore agree to give up some of their liberties because of the crisis of the hour, would they get it back? We can find out the answer to this question through the fact that the government has been asking her citizens to give up their rights even before this incident and under suspicious conditions since there was no crisis nor danger noticeable.

British Intelligence has noticed that American security has been very successful in deterring terrorist activity in this country. But suddenly they are mystified that this massive terrorist attack which must have taken years to plan and implement has not been detected by them even with their sophisticated listening devices that already violate the privacy of all Americans. When the request was made for the citizens to give up some of their privacy, the request claimed specifically that the citizens must allow the government to be able to read encrypted email. They were not asked for the government to be able to read regular email, for it must be common knowledge that she already does that. Now that the attack has taken place, we find that the government is arresting suspects left and right and are catching potential terrorists in their tracks. At the same time she is still asking for the American citizens to give up some of their liberties. How is it that the government can now catch so many people after the terrorist attack without yet attaining the ability to read encrypted email?

Listen to what former President Bill Clinton said two years ago regarding the abilities of the government to track people:

"Thanks to tougher laws, more sophisticated tracking, and powerful new collection tools... with this database there is no where left to run." -- on signing the Deadbeat Parents Punishment Act of 1998. -- President Clinton 6/24/98

The American government knows that terrorists exercise encrypted email from the black market and that no legislation allowing the government to read encrypted email will affect terrorists. The only encrypted email that will be affected will be those of the citizens of America. Why therefore are they still asking Americans to give up their rights to use secure encrypted email in order to catch terrorists?

We find that almost every terrorist is islamic and comes from the middle east. We conclude however that we cannot in any way discriminate against Muslim or Arab American citizens. We now find that almost every email sent by terrorists are encrypted. Are we then going to violate the rights of many others who use encrypted email? Most encrypted email IS NOT SENT BY TERRORISTS!

Read more below:

Terrorism should not be tolerated. However, we notice that other agendas are being incorporated into the battle against it. People are rallying around a good cause. Were there other times in history when people rallied around a good cause? Have you studied the rise of the Communist and Nazi regimes?

1. We are constantly being told that, "We are in a different era," and that "Everything is going to change!" But what made the difference between Sept. 11th and all other times before? What new technology did terrorists use on September 11th that wasn't available to them before for so many years of prosperity?

2. Why is the statement of President Bush telling us that we will not allow terrorists to destroy the freedoms of America now followed by statements telling us that we must do exactly that?

3. Devices reading the emails of citizens and other unconstitutional activities against privacy have already been exercised for a long time by the government and has been protested against by many even private groups. How is it that this terrorist plot obviously taking so long to accomplish was not flagged down by their sophisticated systems and understood using the devices already in play?

Can the reactions to this devastation with suggestions of a new mandate we have heard before give us a clue?

The following discussion found on THIS LINK!

Ted Seeber against Ted McMillan:

it's the modern world that is God's children, and you, like your terrorist idol bin Laden, are Satan's children.

Because I revealed the fact that Ted Seeber openly spoke against liberty and supported persecution, this was his reply. He is saying that I support Osama Bin Laden.

The following discussion found on THIS LINK!

Ted Seeber:

> Liberty is useless, and has only created schism.

You read it right folks, and IN CONTEXT!

Ted McMillan:

> GREAT!! LET'S TAKE AWAY LIBERTY SO THAT WE CAN SEE THE BENEFITS WITHOUT IT AND START THE TEST ON YOUR CHURCH!

Ted Seeber has never answered on this last statement. However, Seeber would insist in a minute that the reason why he said what he said above is that I hate Catholics.

The following discussion is found on THIS LINK!

Ted Seeber:

> > The national leaders are 20 years behind the times, [because they supposedly believe in privacy] just as you are 100 years behind.

Ted McMillan:

> > But I believe in liberty!

Ted Seeber:

And instead, support those who would destroy liberty.

But Ted Seeber already told us that liberty is useless and has only caused schism. How can he say that I support those who would destroy liberty when I don't support Seeber?

Is it true they did not know a thing about this? Why ask for Americans to give up their rights to privacy when it is shown that the government has been asking them to do this and recording their private information with sophisticated devices already for a significant amount of time? Our leaders have not been lately asking us to give up our privacy, for that is already gone. They were asking us to stop encrypting our emails, for they are enabled to and read every other. But terrorists get email encryption programs from the black market. The government still will not be able to read the emails of terrorists, but they will be able to read yours!

4. Should we submit our privacy to a lately "anti-paranoid" government that has all along been telling us that we should give up our liberties even before the latest incident? Wasn't it they who arrested two kindergarteners playing cops and robbers with paper guns for making terrorist threats?

5. Has the government shown hostility to the principles of liberty and the Constitution before the incident? Have we already been given indications that the government is hostile to Constitutional principle?

For an answer to that question, click here. You will be taken to just one source of evidence demonstrating that the government was doing anything and everything to eclipse freedom well before this latest incident.

6. If we agree to give up our liberties and build a police state, will we get it back afterwards when the emergency is over? Can we get that answer by measuring their behavior before the incident?

7. Must we rally behind the government in "community" in trashing the Constitution? How is it that this web site was able to predict that the call to rally behind the decisions of a few in "community" would touch against Constitutional principle?

THE ONSLAUGHT FOR CHANGE TO DESTROY FREEDOM WHILE VERBALLY AFFIRMING IT WILL CONTINUE!!

The devastating series of articles that enables people to trace what is going on behind the scenes and to ultimately be able to determine who the people are who are engineering them!

Another devastating series of two articles that shows why the scriptures tell us the last movements of Antichrist will deceive the "all the world" even though the churches of Christendom have become more popular, powerful and all pervading, and they study about the topic often and are working for revival and reform!

DID WE NOT TELL YOU??

09/20/2001 On Fox News today, Colin Powell said that every nation MUST participate in George Bush's campaign against terrorism. They are saying that whosoever is not with the US global PROPHETIC alliance is with the terrorists. This is more and more demonstrating the nature of this movement against Terrorism. Globalism is operating under the umbrella of a crisis. It is hiding its tracks under a worthy cause. And what would happen to those who would refuse to participate? They would automatically be classed as terrorists! You must look at examples throughout history around those who also had similar dreams of a global community. You must study the Inquisitions that were staged "for the good of society." You must study the communists and the nazis! The element of force and coercion is there and no one will be allowed to take no for an answer.

How can a Constitutional Republic respecting freedom do such a thing? Is something wrong with the following statement:

WE MUST DEFEND FREEDOM! AND YOU DON'T HAVE ANY OPTION TO REFUSE TO SUPPORT HOWEVER WE DEEM IT IS NECESSARY TO DO SO!

Does something sound even a little bit wrong here to you?

After terrorism is destroyed, are there rules and pretexts that will be developed by this global community that everyone must adhere to? Have you been keeping up with the issues of the times? Do you understand that for years now the United States, under the United Nations has been calling for all governments to give up their soveriegnty to the United Nations? Do you understand that private groups have long been struggling with our government to stop her from giving the soveriegnty of the United States over to the United Nations? Read and study Revelation 3!

If nations can be forced [opposite of freedom] into uniting with America's methods for dealing with terrorism under prayer and fasting, can America do the same thing on a citizen-wide basis also on any other issue ultimately? Can she force her citizens to agree with her in every way? The land of the free? If someone doesn't agree with the methods used against terrorism, would they lose their liberties? Would they be classed as terrorists? How can America be the land of the free, granting it to its citizens, if it doesn't grant it to other countries? Is this a sign that she will soon not grant it to her citizens?

We remember when a new movement stormed our church to this day. After time and stealthy manipulation our church leaders told us that everybody had to participate in it. They were changing the liturgy of our denomination as it was done in others for the mandate that our denomination MUST unite with all the others for a global religious community under Rome.

One of the major contentions during the Reformation was that the Gospel was NOT forceful. Those who did not agree with it or were not inclined to religion at all were not to be forced into it according to the Protestants. The Protestants told Rome that Christ comes to the door of every heart and pleads for admittance. He does NOT approach the heart with a battering ram and legislation in order to make church-going more palatable!

09/11/2001 DAY OF INFAMY!!
Have you yet read our series of articles detailing the global conspiracy? You need to read them again in light of what I heard in the comments of Senators Hillary Clinton and Charles Schumer just before 6:00 PM today!

They began to say that decisive measures that may be difficult to accept will have to be implemented immediately and that WE WILL BE PERFECTLY UNITED in the President's decisions for what must be done about the terrorist attack today. Is it possible that what must be done according to the President may have something to do crossing Constitutional policy as has been the growing and persistent trend lately even before the terrorist attack?

Senator Schumer said several times that they will not allow us to voice what we each individually believe is to be done about the situation but he volunteered all our opinions by saying that we will be united with the President. He said also several times that this will be a new day and that we cannot afford to go back presumably to do things or run things the way we always have. Every moment we hear about "community."

The fact is that behind every tragedy that has occurred in our recent lifetimes we always get the impression that the greatest tragedy is not the actual terrorism, but the American Constitution!

"We must stay out of the affairs of other nations!" -- Our American forefathers.

"We are a global community!" "This tragedy is caused by our isolationism!" "We must not become isolationists!"-- Our current national leaders,

and also...

Every communist and every nazi. This has always been a major part of their philosophy!i

Yes, one commentator even said that this terrorist attack occured because of the ISOLATIONISM of the United States--the opposite of what actually caused the situation! Every terrorist attack I know of has occurred because the United States has interfered in the affairs of other nations either in the past, presently, or a combination of the two. This is always done in a drive to build another government global in nature and which none of the American citizenry elected to have.

Our forefathers taught that we MUST NOT get involved in the affairs of other countries NO MATTER WHAT unless there was a direct threat to national security. One way or another, sooner or later, you will see that they knew what they were talking about even when you think that the US should defend people and nations abroad! Enemies are now telling us that we, already fully into affairs we should not be in, should continue further and more boldly into those unconstitutional enterprises! The result of this is plans and more than the building of organizations, orders and policies that you did not vote for and which will cost you everything!!

Better read those articles NOW! Then, when you get a chance, read these other articles that can give you an idea how the best part of the plan of betrayal and treason will be used against liberty and God's people in this country and all over the world!

Your comments are welcome. Please don't hesitate to email me, but read those articles and see whether or not we were kidding when we were trying to alert you to the terrors to come that will originate from within!