ADVENTISM AND THE CRITICAL/JUDGMENTAL SPIRIT!

The Dynamics Around the Issue of Being "Critical," and "The Christian Spirit!"

For those of you who don't know, the Adventist organization is now least trusted by its membership than in any other time of its history. It was and even is to the point where we had to witness in our quarterlies verbal calls to trust the leadership and for us to realize that they are humans. Well we quite know that they are humans, but who has criticized and faulted them for not being superhumans? If that is what they are saying: that we expect them to be superhumans, why don't we suggest a proposition to them:

We have posted here even an official statement written by the denomination against Hope International. This came after they exerted efforts, brought in their Catholic lawyers and sued the Eternal Gospel Seventh-day Adventist Church. As the denominational leaders therefore tell us that we really expect them to be superhumans, we can see where they are directing their energies. We therefore give them a simple solution that would solve the problems:

That way, they will be not only like the superhuman independent ministry leaders, but they will be like all the saints who have ever lived. They will be like God's church and not like a cult. Instead of this, the denomination has embarked on a media campaign to somehow redirect the minds of the people to understand that they don't know what they are talking about when they mistrust the leadership. All this effort in terms of time, talents and money that could have been used to solve the problems is always used to do this! If they can deal with independent ministry leaders and term their actions "apostasy," can they redirect their efforts and use this against those who are committing treason within the denomination? Yet in this campaign they have willingly forgotten another very simple solution to the problem:

It is amazing that only "critical" and mentally deranged people can figure this out! Was it just a few among us who witnessed strange new pastors being sent to our churches and immediately started to tell us that we must have our worship styles changed? Did we not see these pastors first start with sermons against being critical of the church? We wondered whether or not they even understood that the denomination was crying out because of members disaffecting from them and diverting their tithe to other organizations that didn't play these deceptive roles! Why then did these activities which caused all the disaffection INCREASE since there was an uproar against them, instead of decreasing?

For those of you who don't know, while I was on the SDAnet "Adventist" internet email discussion forum, I presented what those committing treason from within the denomination were doing against the people of God. In response to that, the founder and owner of the list, Mr. Steve Timm stepped in to tell me that since 1995 the denomination has been maligning and disfellowshipping those in the church who wanted (actually demanded) change of the denomination. He has recently used this same argument against Emmanuel Clarke, who is a present subscriber to that list, but whose participation has been squelched due to the purely change-minded personel on its board of directors.

Before that time when God's true people were being expelled in droves by those demanding change, they all paraded the idea that no one must be critical of leadership. Even when reading the media accounts of the battles taking place between the denomination and the independent ministries, the leaders of the denomination would always state that we are not to criticize the leaders, and they always did this without giving mention to any condition. They never mentioned what leadership may have been doing to earn that distrust. They were therefore teaching for unconditional trust and obedience to the leadership.

A problem therefore developed since that time. To this very day there are the same strange people on that same and other internet forums demanding change who are currently criticizing the leadership for fighting against those who demand change. In response to some of the good and admirable veteran pastors and leaders still within the denomination who are fighting against the changes, all the internet forums claiming to be Adventist have been riddled with the same people who once told us that we without condition must never criticize the leaders, have been doing it freely. When asked why they did this--why they again and again demonstrate immunity from every principle and especially those that they teach to us, naturally, as good little Vatican militia-people, they evaded our questions.

Why is the same thing happening in state issues? The FBI, the BATF and other government agencies are constantly coming under criticism for their marked disrespect for the Constitution and even common civil laws of this land. Isn't it odd that government agencies and the media are also telling us that we must be diverse and have all kinds of different thoughts and ideas? What has been their response to citizens that distrusted them? Why was it the same as the SDA Church? The FBI and other government agencies also have been accusing disaffected citizens of being judgmental, paranoid, wierd, conspiracy theorists, and all for all, mentally deranged and wacko! In both the examples of the government and the SDA Church organization, they deceive members into not knowing nor realizing what the Judgmental and Critical Spirit really is! In BOTH cases the activities that caused the disaffection have increased without any sign of stopping. It is clear that the problems will not be solved until we expel the problems. They are therefore now using all the media in our land to condition the people into believing that the problem is those who refuse to have their system revised and changed to the Dark Ages model.

While these government agencies are telling the citizens of the United States not to be paranoid, and even ridiculing them by saying, "OH! THE BIG BAD GOVERNMENT IS OUT TO GET YA!! WATCH OUT!!" They themselves are exhibiting the greatest paranoia. Even just recently, the FBI has installed an internet surveillance device called, "Carnivore." Reports tell us that this system is even right now installed directly into internet service providers of many internet users. This device gives the FBI the ability to read EVERY EMAIL that is sent!

Of course, the FBI tells us that she will not be reading every email, but only those that are suspicious. She has said, "Trust us! We're the government!" If that were so--if what she said was true of her intentions--she would have been content with other means where she could not read every email. She has already promised us that she will not read every email, but if this is consistent with the words and promises of what also has been happening in church and in the internet discussion forums, we have merely to understand that they are going to freely and boldly read any and every email that they want! Just the fact that they told us they will not is supposed to be proof that they will, based upon experience. Privacy is indeed a things of the past.

The Carnivore system is a new system--a system that has come to fruition RIGHT IN THE MIDST OF THE GROWING CONCERN FOR INTERNET PRIVACY AS IT RELATES TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE GROWING DISRESPECT OF THE CONSTITUTION BY THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT! The government has adopted the General Conference philosophy that when the members distrust the leadership they as the leadership must do what they can to make sure that the activities which caused the disaffection MUST INCREASE. They must re-educate the members and citizens to understand that their thinking needs to change and that they must accept what is happening: THE THINGS TAKING PLACE THAT CAUSED THE DISTRUST MUST CONTINUE AND GET WORSE!!

What is the critical spirit, and how can the influence of the truths presented on this website be defeated without the people trying to defeat them becoming "critical" or "judgmental?" As you probably have already noticed, we have captured documents published by the Adventist Review where she freely criticizes and judges those who are exposing what she and the denomination at large are doing against the truth. When she places judgments against those who are exposing her, she leaves not one room for anyone to differ with what she has judged, and hypocritizes freely from every principle she has helped to teach the masses to adopt. How does she palm off the idea that she is not judgmental and critical while pointing directly with the criticizing finger at those who are exposing her?

The denomination as a whole always appears to affix to their judgmental documents the statement that they are not acting out of ill-will against her enemies, but is speaking out of warm Christian love. On the internet forums, we see this quite often. Strange people would emerge on discussion forums and newsgroups telling us terrible things about Ellen White, and would often both start and end their messages telling us that they are speaking out of "warm Christian love." And why must they mention this in words? It is because otherwise you would not know that's the spirit they were speaking out of. They have taught you plainly not to write documents or send posts in anywhere near the nature that they have posted: we must not write nor post anything negative or critical. But still yet, they cannot accomplish their mission if they do not condemn their enemies. Ultimately their goal is to destroy those who would expose them. They therefore can NEVER deal with their enemies by obeying their own rules against the critical and judgmental spirit. You must remember that during the late 80s and all throughout the 90s and to this day, many have been disfellowhipped by the new leaders who are making quite a noise against the critical and judgmental spirit: a condition which is literally impossible. How were all these people disfellowshipped without bad things being said against them? The reason is because they were not disfellowshipped without bad things being said against them: bad things WERE said against them by people who are naturally immune to every principle.

What then should you think or do when you even receive sabbath school quartlies that continue to tell you about the dangers of "unofficial publications" written by the same people who taught you how to give the same response as above? What should you do if you see ministers standing on your pulpits telling you what they do when they receive "unofficial publications" in the mail? What do you do when you even see them approaching the microphone or publishing their concerns that the apostasy just might be interrupted? We have both seen and heard from many quarters that ministers were telling congregations about "unofficial publications" and stating that when they receive such in the mail, they just throw it "into file 13" representing the garbage can. After all the sermons and periodicals telling you that you should be diverse and should think for yourselves, they weren't trying to convince you to follow their example and lose your individuality, were they?

If you have, then you have demonstrated that you have not been thoroughly deceived by them, but that you can indeed think for yourselves and more realize what's going on and where we are headed, even though that no-care attitude is still wrong. The problem is that most people cannot realize the great independence and immunity shown by new Adventist leadership to their own principles. Most Americans cannot realize the same attributes shown by members of all branches of the government. This ignorance IS going to cost you!!

AND YES, THERE ARE GOOD LEADERS STILL IN THE ADVENTIST CHURCH. PROOF OF THIS IS THE FACT THAT IT HAS NOT FALLEN YET!! They do understand what is going on and are working to control the situation.