THE ISSUES OF FREEDOM WEBSITE!

Because many of our readers had questions in their minds over some of the issues that were undertaken by us in defense of the truth thus far on this website, we felt we had to make this endeavor to point out some very necessary and related facts.

Too many have been coming around us like pestilent mosquitos telling us that the vital principle of Separation of Church and State was a great mistake, and that our nation must be refashioned in order to allow church officials to control the government. We find that those who have this contention are everywhere and very powerful. This is a strange discovery after realizing that these tell us all the time that we are to do nothing but focus upon Christ and celebrate in Him all the time. Some of us have listened and found through experience that to do that does in no way enhance our political skill or abilities. From where thence did these acquire such power and political skill?

They are literally changing all our churches and possess a worldwide influence. Some of us now understand that there was not a thing they ever taught us or begged us to accept that was ever an option. Everything they tricked us into accepting or debating was always intended to be an imperative. They are conditioning us for changes some of them are now admitting must absolutely come whether we like it or not. They have not yet admitted that it was always intended to be that way, nor have they told us who they actually are.

Since we understand now what they are doing and now oppose them, they, with every opportunity they get, tell the world that we hate them just because they disagree with our views. Church after church is being revised and edited to give up their doctrines so that they can all unite with each other and with the government. The winds from the past reveal all too clearly the origin and endeavor of these movements. These were movements that used to thrive for centuries until they were interrupted by a certain strange cry. The name for that cry was. . .

The principle of Separation of Church and State was nowhere to be found in the Old Testament! As a matter of fact, the Children of Israel were a theocracy. Church was deeply rooted with the state. Why do we therefore keep this principle of Separation of Church and State??!!

We keep it because situations have changed now. Something is here today which was not present in its form in the Old Testament.

The Mystery of Iniquity is Here!!

Just as soon and the very day that it is solidly decided to do away with the principle of Separation of Church and State, the most skillful and organized power into politics will take over. Many people among you will spring into action and reorganize things according to the Dark Ages model and reinstitute religious persecution.

THE NEW ANTI-TERRORISM LEGISLATION HAS BEEN PASSED BY THE SENATE AND IS ABOUT TO BE SIGNED INTO LAW BY PRESIDENT BUSH. IT IS ONE OF THE MOST POTENT ANTI-CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATION THAT HAS BEEN WRITTEN IN THIS CENTURY! IT DOES NOTHING AGAINST CONSTITUTIONAL TERRORISM AND OUR NATIONAL MEDIA HAS NOT TOLD YOU THE HALF ABOUT ITS ACTUAL INTENTIONS NOR RAMIFICATIONS!

Read more about what this legislation is all about on the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) web page links below. Check and see if what is proposed is really a defense of freedom!

DO NOT FEEL SMUG AT THE THOUGHT THAT ORGANIZATIONS LIKE THE ACLU PROMISE TO MONITOR OR HINDER THE EFFORTS OF THE GOVERNMENT TO FORM A POLICE STATE FOR GLOBALIZATION. FORMER INSIDERS TO THE PAPACY HAVE INFORMED US THAT ORGANIZATIONS EVEN OPPOSING THE CURRENT MOVEMENTS AGAINST FREEDOM ARE ALSO DOMINATED BY THE DESPOTS OF THE PAPACY!

"This bill goes light years beyond what is necessary to combat terrorism," said Laura Murphy, Director of the ACLU Washington National Office. "Included in the bill are provisions that would allow for the mistreatment of immigrants, the suppression of dissent and the investigation and surveillance of wholly innocent Americans."

In his speech, Ashcroft vowed that the "hour that [the anti-terrorism bill] becomes law, I will issue guidance to each of our 94 U.S. Attorney's Offices and 56 FBI field offices directing them to begin immediately implementing this sweeping legislation." He said the bill would open a "law enforcement campaign." "While we are ourselves concerned for the country's safety, we are also concerned by the Attorney General's apparent gusto to implement certain provisions in the bill that threaten liberty," Murphy said. "We will be keeping a close eye on how these new powers are used by the Administration." "These new and unchecked powers," said Gregory T. Nojeim, Associate Director of the ACLU's Washington Office, "could be used against American citizens who are not under criminal investigation, immigrants who are here within our borders legally and also against those whose First Amendment activities are deemed to be threats to national security by the Attorney General."

Response to Terrorist Attacks

October 23, 2001: Letter to Senate Urging Rejection on Final Version of USA PATRIOT Act

October 23, 2001: Letter to House on Final Passage on USA PATRIOT Act

October 23, 2001: How the Anti-Terrorism Bill Expands Law Enforcement "Sneak and Peak" Warrants (updated)

October 23, 2001: How the Anti-Terrorism Bill Puts Student Privacy at Risk (updated)

October 23, 2001: How the Anti-Terrorism Bill Would Convert Dissent into Broadly Defined "Terrorism" (updated)

October 23, 2001: How the Anti-Terrorism Bill Permits Indefinite Detention of Immigrants Who Are Not Terrorists(updated)

October 23, 2001: How the Anti-Terrorism Bill Puts Financial Privacy at Risk (updated)

October 23, 2001: How the Anti-Terrorism Bill Limits Judicial Oversight of Telephone and Internet Surveillance (updated)

October 23, 2001:How the Anti-Terrorism Bill Allows for Detention of People Engaging in Innocent Associational Activity (updated)

October 23, 2001: How the Anti-Terrorism Bill Enables Law Enforcement to Use Intelligence Authorities to Circumvent the Privacy Protections Afforded in Criminal Cases

October 23, 2001: How the Anti-Terrorism Bill Puts the CIA Back in the Business of Spying on Americans

October 19, 2001: Letter to House and Senate Judiciary Committees On Covert Searches Provisions in Anti-Terrorism Legislation

October 17, 2001: Letter to Attorney General Ashcroft Expressing Concerns on Lack of Information on Persons Arrested or Detained Sinice September 11 Attacks

October 16, 2001: Letter to the House Urging Opposition to the "Financial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001," the Oxley Bill

October 12, 2001: Testimony of ACLU Legislative Counsel Timothy H. Edgar Before the United States Commission on Civil Rights On Changes in Immigration Detention Practices and the Impact of Proposed Legislation on the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties of Citizens and Immigrants

October 12, 2001: Letter to House Urging Them to Vote "No" on PATRIOT Act

October 9, 2001: Intelligence Surveillance: How the Senate Anti-Terrorism Bill Enables Law Enforcement to Circumvent the Privacy Protections Afforded in Criminal Cases

October 9, 2001: Surveillance of Americans: How the Senate Anti-Terrorism Bill Puts the CIA Back in the Business of Spying on Americans

October 9, 2001: Letter to Senate Urging Rejection Of U.S.A. Act

October 8, 2001: Telephone and Internet Surveillance: How the Senate Anti-Terrorism Bill Limits Judicial Oversight

October 8, 2001: How the Senate Anti-Terrorism Bill Expands Law Enforcement "Sneak and Peak" Warrants

October 8, 2001: How the Senate Anti-Terrorism Bill Would Convert Dissent into Broadly Defined "Terrorism"

October 8, 2001: How the Senate Anti-Terrorism Bill Puts the Privacy of Student Records at Risk

October 8, 2001: How the Senate Anti-Terrorism Bill Puts Financial Privacy at Risk

October 8, 2001: How the Senate Anti-Terrorism Bill Exempts Justice Department Attorneys from State Bar Rules that Protect Rights

October 8, 2001: How the Senate Anti-Terrorism Bill Permits Indefinite Detention of Immigrants Who Are Not Terrorists

October 8, 2001: How the Senate Anti-Terrorism Bill Allows for Detention and Deportation of People Engaging in Innocent Associational Activity

October 2, 2001: Letter to Congress Urging Changes in Provisions of Anti-Terrorism Legislation

October 1, 2001: Michigan Coalition Letter Concerning September 11 Attacks

September 27, 2001: Letter to Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta on Air-Security and Passenger Safety Regulations

September 24, 2001: Statement by ACLU Counsel Rachel King on Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 Before the House Judiciary Committee

September 20, 2001: In Defense of Freedom at a Time of Crisis

September 20, 2001: Letter to House and Senate Leaders on Authorization of Use of Military Force, S.J. Res. 23

In just a little while this nation will be mimicking the many strange disappearances of political dissidents that took place after the establishment of the Nazi regime. The means to arbitrarily establish what terrorism is has already been put into place, along with the government being allowed to do anything with anyone it perceives to be a "terrorist." As with every horrible regime of history that had a terrible disrespect for human life, the pinnings have already been put into place to make sure that all who are accused of being terrorists by the government will not be allowed to defend themselves in any due process of law.

Ted Seeber, a Dark Ages Catholic, makes a profound statement demonstrating his complete disrespect for human life in the link entitled, "HAS ROME CHANGED?" II

A Major Tragedy Probably Destined to Bring On Many Others May Well Be the Major Turning Point in History for Freedom!

We now have learned today (10/15/2001) that Senator Tom Daschle has received a package through the mail that contained Anthrax. Is it now time to pass laws against the free postal system?

DIFFERENT AGENDI FOUND TO BE A USUAL COMPONENT OF ALL PARANOIA ABOUT TERRORISTS BY THE GOVERNMENT:

"The ACLU recognizes that the bombing in Oklahoma City should prompt a re-examination the ability of law enforcement to protect against violent activity. However, this re-examination should be conducted carefully, and any new proposals should be narrowly focussed on the problem they purport to address, and be consistent with the Constitution. Terrorism legislation to deal with criminal activity need not add the Bill of Rights to the list of casualties in Oklahoma City." -- From the ACLU web page discussing the Oklahoma City bombing incident in 1995.

Go there and read very carefully so that you can understand what we are dealing with here even under the good cause for destroying terrorism! During those days, the government even struggled to classify patriot and militia groups along with those who even subscribe to their media as being terrorists. The bills presented allowed the government to classify all such, and to introduce secret evidence against all classified as terrorists WITHOUT them having any ability to defend themselves or to have due process in any court of law.

NEW INSIGHTS shown to the people about the new Anti-terrorism proposals legislation that John Ashcroft worked very fast to ram into law. Just examine the new legislation and you will see why he and everyone else determined to rush legislation through aim do it as fast as possible so that people can't think about it first.

As we have told you, the day you allow your liberties to be compromised or taken away, will be the day you will not receive them again! We are now being told that the fight against terrorism will be ONGOING! So will the laws against liberties and privacy that will be rammed quickly into law by those who have been working to institute these laws much earlier.

President Bush spoke to the nation today (10/07/2001) and reiterated his past positions. He said we need to make sacrifices, and he told us again that any nation that is not with the US and its methods for dealing with terrorism will be regarded as terrorists and their fates are in their hands. Is it really freedom that the American leadership are defending? These words are usually followed by statements telling us that any nation that sponsors terrorism will have their fates in their hands, but the words are not clear enough? There are many countries that do not sponsor terrorism, but disagree with President Bush's methods for dealing with it. Why is the government and media not clear on this? This lack of clarity is not a characteristic of the forefathers of this nation. The time will come when you will wish they came out of their graves and led this country again!

On Fox News, they highlighted the fact that President Bush claimed that he had the united support of the entire world for his offensive against terrorism. But from President Bush's statements above against all nations that even would be neutral, how can we not be surprised that he has that entire support?

Shortly after the above was written, a spokesperson said that, as we have predicted, naturally there would be other internal groups and even citizens who will not agree to support the current methods for dealing with terrorism? That spokesperson said that all such will have no choice. They will have to get in line.

In both church and state are calls for members and citizens to stop "resisting change." As change is then orchestrated, a common occurence would be bills, mandates and laws that have to be literally RAMMED in quickly. That happened in our churches and we can see that Attorney General John Ashcroft has been very quick and persistent to do what he can to RAM in new legislation granting more power to the already overpowered US government for the stated purpose of dealing with terrorism.

Can any of you figure out why speed is always necessary in these affairs in both church and state? To find out, Click here!

If you think the reason is to deal quickly with terrorism, think again! Short of civil war, there can be nothing that would terrify an ANTI-PARANOID government that did everything to train Americans about the perils of being paranoid for years even before this incident.

The Issue of Privacy | next part | third part | Fourth part | NEW Last Part.. Will Building a Police State Protect Us Against Terrorists? We see that the result of the terrorist attacks is more people viewing the government as a new utopia for security. In that there are too many things we are forgetting!

A new series of articles that opens up the issue over whether or not it doesn't matter if the government snoops on us if we are just good citizens who have nothing to hide.

The Unscrupulous Workers of the Papacy in Action Learn some of the tactics of the infiltrating workers of the Papacy from this link. This is the Jesuit Dialogues Page. Observe very carefully how they argue on the forums so that you can be prepared for when you notice your national leaders use these same tactics to argue away your rights and liberties in the very near future under an agenda for security and peace for the world.

Holocaust survivors place class action lawsuit against the Vatican for her complicity and support of the Nazi and Ustashi regimes during WWII!! The Vatican struggles to have the case dismissed.

THE PURPOSE OF DIVERSITY!
Find out the fundamental secrets behind the changes taking place in society today! These series of links enables you to understand that there really is a global conspiracy taking place around you using signs that you yourselves can see every day.

Check out this article where a Korean lady protests against the Japanese government gutting out the record of her atrocities during WWII. The Japanese government is wondering, "Why couldn't this Korean woman 'forgive and forget'"? Why bring up contentious issues?

Why does this Korean woman, according to the Catholic posters on the newsgroups, hate Japanese people?

The Need for and Rise of Communism! A simplistic look at the sentiments which foresaw the necessity of creating the political philosophy of Communism.

Conspiracy Theorist Definition! Some of the issues involved when being called a "Conspiracy Theorist" by those who profess to favor free thought. A BIBLICAL EXAMPLE IS USED!

Why Rome Does What She Does! Rome seeks to take over the world. This process will involve killing millions of people who do not even know they have anything to do with any such issue. Why would Rome do this? Can it be safe to say that the Israelites did the same things?

The amazing parable called, SENSIBLE PEOPLE shatters the common response Rome uses against anyone who dares to expose what she is doing.