|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
CONTINUED FROM PART I
Updated
10/18/2001: Made easier to copy
Well, the establishers of this nation have long been saying that there was an "enemy" to the nation: an army, so to speak, which is intent on destroying the principles which guide this nation. We today seem to have forgotten this. Do such a people exist today? Who might these people be?
The question is, while we are all in diversity and entertain many different and conflicting ideas about everything, could it be possible that this "enemy" army actually does not debate about anything, but is incredibly unified in belief? If there existed two armies of equal weapons and manpower force ready to engage in battle, and one army had soldiers who were incredibly unified and agreed in everything pertaining to the war in every particular, against the other which had all kinds of diverse views, which army would win? Is it possible that this seeming parable of two armies is an actual expression of what is going on today?
Is it possible that there is a secret and unified army among us who effect those whom we elect for public office? Is it possible that while we absent ourselves from voting in protest of the candidates for public office, this invisible army votes and choses who will lead of its own will? NOT ONLY ARE ALL THESE THINGS POSSIBLE, THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT IS ACTUALLY TAKING PLACE IN SOCIETY TODAY!!
"Oh!" you may say: "I don't believe in conspiracy theories! I don't believe in anything that cannot be proved!" Well you've been listening to the "theories" of Evolution all your life. Do you remember one moment in your life when these "theories" were ever proven? Since you are in an environment of diversity and love different views, why do you scorn those who honestly believe there is a conspiracy? Isn't that strange? Just hear me out for a second. PLEASE LISTEN! You'll be able to see why this DIVERSITY which we are told is the source of our strength is necessary for the changes which are taking place today.
The question is, if I wanted the clear answers as to what is the best course to be pursued to ensure the prosperity of this nation, would it help me if I solicited the answers from the general public or the citizens of the United States? Automatically your answer would be no. Why? The answer would be because I would get many different and conflicting answers. The American people would prove to me that they don't know what they're talking about. The conclusion therefore would be, "WILL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE LEAD THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?" The answer is no. WHO THEN WILL LEAD? The answer as to who will lead will fall upon the only other option which exists in society. Which is what?
The ones who will lead will be the ones who can be the only beneficiaries of this diversity we are told is the secret of our strength: those in positions of influence and authority. This is because those who occupy positions of influence and authority are supposed to be bound by written rules. What if those written rules can be rendered "interpretable" or can be reinterpreted to mean opposite from what they were originally intended to mean? If the American people are "suckered" into making everything subjective, how can they stop such actions? Can you use the Constitution of the United States to appeal against the changes taking place in government today? Those enforcing the changes say no, and tell you that if you resist the changes or claim that the Constitution is opposed to those changes, you have misinterpreted the Constitution: you merely interpret it differently from other people. In the DIVERSITY, people can interpret the Constitution many different ways. When that happens, leadership can then enforce the illegal changes with no one able to stop them. This therefore shows us who is going to benefit from the diversity--who are the prime beneficiaries of this diversity we are told is the secret of our strength: those in positions of influence and authority!
Ladies and gentlemen: Do yourselves a favor and preserve your dignity! If you live in a society where there are all kinds of different and differing views canceling each other out, will earth shattering political and ideological trends and motions contrary to our established order develop? We admit there is a possibility that trends could already exist if one particular idea had a sizeable majority over the other or others. But new political and ideological trends absolutely cannot develop out of thin air--certainly not out of a diverse society! Our present system of government would therefore actually be preserved under diversity if it was truly a genuine and beneficial principle. YOU CAN'T HAVE CHANGE WHEN A MAJORITY OF SOCIETY OPPOSES IT. Why then are we having change anyway??
The interesting fact is however that new political and ideological trends DID develop and are developing. Amazingly, those who resist these trends and changes among those who live in the United States ARE the majority, for a change involves transforming society from what it originally was, therefore naturally starting only with a minority to initiate and develop the changes. Amazingly, this sizeable majority which opposes the changes, IS LOSING! How can this be!!
Please think for a moment: If I was to make the statement that our churches and government are mostly controlled by despots, would you believe me? A despot is a person who is tyrannical. Not only does he not care about your opinions, he doesn't even believe that you have rights to your property, free speech, or even your lives against his desires. I therefore have to make a very bold statement: There are more despots living around you today than at any other time in the history of the earth! This fact and condition will cause a "time of trouble such as was not since there was a nation" and "even to that same time." Do you agree with that statement? You may well disagree, for you would tell me that you don't see any. I would agree that you practically don't see any; but there is a reason for that.
If a despot stepped up to a microphone in order to work for his purposes in cheating you out of your liberties, how would he go about it? If his words were in line with his real intentions, he would proudly approach the microphone and state:
"ALL RIGHT! FROM NOW ON EVERYBODY HAS TO LISTEN TO ME! THERE ARE NO "IFS" "ANDS" OR "BUTS." YOU MUST DO WHAT I SAY AND SURRENDER ALL TO ME NOW!! YOU MUST TELL ME EVERYTHING YOU KNOW, ALL YOUR PRIVATE INFORMATION, AND YOU MUST SUBMIT TO HAVING DETECTION DEVICES INSTALLED IN YOUR HOMES SO THAT I CAN LISTEN IN AND VIEW ON THE THINGS THAT YOU ARE SAYING AND DOING!!"
You and I therefore know that no one would step before a microphone and make statements like these! If you did that and the Joe-six packs, the truckers, the motorcycle riders, etc. heard you make statements like these, you would be in BIG TROUBLE! They would know clearly that you are a despot, and, upon that knowledge, despots would become extinct. It is therefore only natural that despots would come or show themselves in a much different way. That way is that they would step up to the microphone and continually tell the people how it is great to have all kinds of different opinions. That's what they are doing now. THAT IS WHY YOU CANNOT SEE THEM!!
But you may say that those who love freedom state this also. That is not true. They tell the people that they have a right to state their honest beliefs, but they do not say that the result is an ideal condition, nor even a beneficial one especially if ideas are not tested fairly one against another. Confusion profits no one. What they do is that they allow people to state their honest views with the intent that all can find truth: that they may one day only upon honest searching can come to a mutual understanding and be as one. They present their ideas in discussion. That way others will be able to see the merits of each and will be able to determine who may be right or wrong if they find a reliable standard to judge by. In the early days of this nation, the standard was the bible.
It is therefore unfortunate that the words of the despots would be close to the words of those who genuinely love freedom. It is sometimes hard to tell them apart. We will more discuss how to tell them apart in other articles on this web site.
Yet unconscionable changes are also determinedly taking place in the churches AND IN THE SAME WAY, while religious leaders are also hailing the necessity for DIVERSITY. The developments that are flooding in upon us are labeled "NEW", yet those developments ALWAYS CONSISTENTLY challenge the foundation principles the United States and all the churches used to have. Church and state is being attacked and transformed. CHURCH AND STATE! IS THIS REALLY JUST BY ACCIDENT!!
Religious leaders are everywhere pushing rock, jazz and pop music (among others) into the divine services of all the churches even though a very sizeable majority resist these changes and demand justification for them based upon the doctrines and tenets of their respective church bodies. Religious leaders are struggling to make sure that the churches do not teach doctrine nor anything that would allow them to stand upon their own principles so that they can make their own decisions. They are telling the churches that "Christ" is all that they need, and inspire and even force them to do nothing but celebrate "Christ and His salvation" so that they can be dumbed down. Right and wrong, the proper functioning of their churches and the proper functioning of their countries, the understanding of biblical prophecy, are being forced out of their consciousness, while these things are being changed by super-political experts: THE VERY PEOPLE WHO ARE TELLING OTHERS TO FOCUS ONLY UPON CHRIST! If focusing on Christ gives you such a political talent and a talent to control and manipulate, please demonstrate to me how!
Though the bible possesses 66 books of information, they urge people to only study small portions which talk only about Jesus, and not even all the scriptures dealing with Christ at that. They are pushing for a one world global religion, while our national leaders are struggling to form a one world international order. This has caused unprecedented distrust of leadership in both church and state. Religious leaders also have not been taking no for an answer, but are, in the same way, also publishing their astonishment that their members would not trust them while they continue to push the changes against all objections, and, like political leadership, do the self-same things which caused the distrust. Again, since diverse views prevail in these religious bodies, religious leadership replies to those resisting change, that the Bible and the rules established by their respective churches cannot be used to appeal against the changes, for people have different interpretations of those rules. The only thing therefore left that can be established as definite authority in both church and state IS THE DECISIONS OF THE LEADERS! AMAZING! ALL THE PRINCIPLES OF OUR SOCIETY REVERSED THROUGH A MOST DECEPTIVE PHILOSOPHY!! It is amazing the field day many in positions of power and influence are having over the people!
Therefore, as one purpose we can establish for the diversity, we notice that the voices of those who would warn us or resist the changes would be canceled out. When others stand in the way telling us that nothing is wrong and that there is no conspiracy, then every active idea or impression alerting us to the danger we are in will be canceled out. When others tell us that they don't see anything wrong with the changes taking place, society is left to the mercy of the ruling bodies which pump out the new rules. If you are in a diverse society where all ideas cancel each other out, be alarmed if you still yet notice unified rules, decrees and trends continuing to pump out of Washington, or from denominational headquarters: YOU ARE UNDER A CONSPIRACY!
You don't think so? Well why then not ask yourselves the question as to why the politicians in Washington do not cancel each other out also? If there are leaders determining to enforce change, why are there not others who would oppose such changes and therefore stop the motion of the changes? The answer is because those who are enforcing the changes really do not like nor believe in DIVERSITY. They are not bound to it. For them themselves to accept diversity would be to jeopardize their treacherous aims, for a diverse government would not be enforcing any change! THESE ARE THE ENEMIES OUR FOREFATHERS WARNED US ABOUT!!
TO THE ADVENTIST BETRAYAL PAGE
